2019-12-05 Meeting notes

Date

Dec 6, 2019

Participants

  • @Natalie Tagge (Unlicensed)

  • @Annie Johnson (Unlicensed)

  • @Kristina De Voe (Unlicensed)

  • @Alicia Pucci

  • @Rebecca Lloyd

  • @Urooj Nizami (Unlicensed)

  • @Rachel Appel (Unlicensed)

  • @Lauri Fennell (Unlicensed)

Not present:

Lauri

Agenda:

Emerging trends 2019 meeting, 12/5/19 

 

 Kristina 

Shuttleworth, K., Stranack, K., & Moore, A. (2019). Course Journals: Leveraging Library Publishing to Engage Students at the Intersection of Open Pedagogy, Scholarly Communications, and Information Literacy. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v14i2.5339

Semester long project, class builds journal 

Produce final project, publish it as journal

Opp for librarian to come in to talk about scholarly communication topics 

Librarian helps put online on OJS

Other projects students more behind the scenes, finding content creators, outside community or group

Touch on all ACRL framework frames

Pitfalls: time intensive for faculty and library, might not be sustainable, issues with privacy

Future research: see how fit into disciplinary framework 

Possibly something to consider at Temple 

 Annie

https://www.arl.org/news/openmonographs-org-launches-to-flip-funding-model-for-university-publishing/

update on TOME project

Nonprofit foil to Knowledge Unlatched

Academic institutions give $15,000 to faculty to make book OA. Faculty can publish with any participating university press.

Challenge a lot of universities are not willing to provide $30,000-$45,000 a year  (to support 2-3 faculty members books)  

Original goal is to get institution not library to be funder 

Joe would never have brought to provost, money would be going to other presses potentially 

New website to promote 

Published a number of books

Big overall challenge: where will the money come from?, long term sustainability

Originally thought would get schools where there isn’t a press

17 universities participating 

 Alicia: 

"A Creative and Poetic Approach to Creative Commons Copyright License Education." Sharing links to the slides and additional instructional materials.

University of Denver IR manager and instructional designer presented about interactive library instructional workshop

Educates on creative commons licensing

Very hands on, engaging alternative -University of Denver, create an openly licensed poem, use poems that can be reused 

Goals: bring content into IR, it can be a collaborative effort with DH students, 

Another example of hands on activity: Use playdough to teach different Creative Commons licenses 

 Natalie: 

The institutional repository landscape in medical schools and academic health centers: a 2018 snapshot view and analysis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774547/.

Of 153 member libraries 63 responded to the survey (41% response rate)

70% had IR or were implementing one

60% institution-wide IR, 40% their own health sciences one 

Earliest launched 2002 and newest 2017 

Unique resource types: Grey lit that hasn’t been published anywhere else is pretty popular  

Grand rounds presentations

Patient education materials

Lab notebooks

71% reported depository staff deposit materials on behalf of users 

Health Sciences have low rates of self-deposit 

IRs in academic medical libraries appeared to have much in common with IRs in other academic environments (not surprising, but good to know)

 Rebecca:

https://www.coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/

https://www.historians.org/news-and-advocacy/aha-advocacy/aha-expresses-concerns-about-potential-impact-of-plan-s-on-the-humanities

https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/march-2019/plan-s-and-the-humanities-funders-push-harder-on-open-access

Plan S 

Gist of it: coalition of European bodies (few U.S. and international funding agencies) open access mandate

As of 2021 all of the funded research must be made open access with no embargo 

Pushing boundaries of OA

Most European researchers get money from these funders, covers all disciplines

supporters , but critiques, AHA wrote scathing article against it, Royal Historical Society did a survey of history journals editors, were not aware of Plan S

May have stepped back from CC-BY license  

One size fits all doesn’t work for all disciplines at least right now

Plan S is good because it’s forcing humanities faculty, editors to think about this. Even if they aren’t going to change.

Will keep pushing back deadline 

Critique: Int’l implications

Top journals in the United States don’t have reason to adjust for UK historians 

 Urooj

Resources:

College of the Canyons Style Guide and Environmental Scan Exercise: A Diagnostic Tool (p. 24)

Draft Recommendation On Open Educational Resources UNESCO Digital Library and the Kerfuffle 

 Practical and helpful

Style guide from the College of the Canyons (community college) to promote open textbooks

All the graphics are there to make your own textbook

Ecampus Ontario 

Environmental scan diagnostic tool

UNESCO open educational recommendations

Bit of a kerfuffle, because open license language was removed from final recommendations

 Rachel: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/pa7jxb/archivists-are-trying-to-make-sure-a-pirate-bay-of-science-never-goes-down

Crowd sourced money to download SciHub and create a copy and save it on seedbox

The Archivist -who is this? Maybe someone from Internet Archive?

Publishers want to crack down on torrenting of articles

How would they do this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 



Action items

Decisions