2017-05-24 Meeting notes

 

Agenda

  • Review project charge
    • Brief overview of discussion from last LibGuides Administrators Meeting (JS)
    • Administrative perspective (SB)
    • Scope and deliverables (JS and SB) 
  • Timeline and task overview (JS, All) 
  • Roles and responsibilities of team members (All)
    • Dividing up work 
  • Standing meeting time (All)

Attendees

Meeting Notes

Administrative perspective from SB

  • Review process needs to be one that is not ambiguous for the review team 
  • Plan to share standards and review process with our colleagues along the way for feedback 
  • The review process should include 
    • "pre-authoring" request to determine need and author of a new guide 
    • a plan for doing a retrospective review of existing guides
    • a provision for authoring a guide quickly (for a class, etc.)
  • LGRP group has authority to 
    • create standards based on usability testing and other evidence-based standards such as those published by other institutions; providing a rationale for standards will be useful for our colleagues 
    • determine scope of LibGuides content (i.e. what belongs in LibGuides rather than other CMS); ET will investigate content scope for Drupal

Templates

  • Discussion of usefulness of templates; RL has idea about how these would look 

Next Steps 

  • Review standards from other institutions and best practices from usability testing 

Next meeting 

  • Outline standards categories and divide between group members to write

Standing meeting

  • Every other Wed 11AM Rm 137




Action items

  • All group members log in to Confluence and find group space 
  • Jackie Sipes set up standing meeting on calendar 
  • Emily Toner find out about guidelines for what content belongs in Drupal or other guidelines about what goes where in library CMSs 

Everyone complete following tasks for next meeting