Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Date

Participants

Assessment of OA week:

3 workshops and social media posts 

Getting Started with Open Science

Low attendance

2 faculty that did come were interested 

Make Your Courses Affordable with Open Textbooks and Open Educational Resources (OERs)

Number of librarians attended

7-8 attended (4-5 faculty, rest Temple librarians)

“Predatory” Publishing: Addressing Bias and Avoiding Pitfalls

158 in attendance and 212 registered.

Mainly non-Temple librarians attended.

We will collocate evaluation responses from OA week and put them in OA week 2020 “OA week feedback” Confluence folder. 

Plan to do an analysis of registrants. Possibly look at the disciplines of the attendees. 

OA week in the future

Questions

Is OA week the right time of year for faculty to be able to attend?

Is there a way to make content interesting to faculty and researchers? Hasn’t really worked in the past-example finding images workshop.

Should OA week be focused on continuing education for librarians because that’s who is coming to events? 

Could OA week be the launch of OA publishing fund for the year?

Ideas:

Undergraduate journal panel

How to identify OA/OER materials for using in classes.

Spring workshops

Open education week in March. OER subgroup hasn’t decided on workshops yet. HSL has one workshop planned.

Fair use week in February. 

Love your data week in February. 

Are workshops the best way for scholarly communication group to meet goals?

Thirty minute workshops are the best thing to do.

Title is important because that is what is being advertised.

Possibly do something that is gamified. 

Are planning staff development workshop in spring.

We will continue discussion of workshops at the next meeting.


Action items

  •  

Decisions

  • No labels