Versions Compared

Old Version 42

changes.mady.by.user Jackie Sipes

Saved on

compared with

New Version 43

changes.mady.by.user Nancy Turner

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

CategoryTaskDescriptionWhoNotesStatus
StandardsReview standards document Review full document and note issues regarding readability/usability, consistency in tone and voice, need for more justification, need for directional infoAll

Complete by   - is more time needed?

In progress 
StandardsReview suggestions/comments for sections you wrote Review suggestions and comments made by other team members for your sections. Approve/reject suggestions and revise any sections necessary.All 

Complete by  


Standards Review outlineReview standards outline for heading and section names and overall order All 

Complete by  


Standards Submit to external readerColleague outside of group read standards and 1) note anything confusing 2) test instructions to make sure process works when creating and editing actual guides

Ideas for who might do this? The document is long, the semester is upon us, and this is not a small task. Alternatively, one of us could just work through the instructions to make sure everything works. before we do this, someone needs to go through doc and accept track changes, etc.


Standards Finalize standards document Finishing touches after group and external reviewer have completed review 1-2 peopleHow do we want to submit this with our report? As a document (it's current format) or should we go ahead and create the LibGuide? JS thinks LibGuides admins should review before we create Guide. 
Review ProcessDraft document of review process
NancyComplete by In progress
Review ProcessReview and comment on review doc
AllComplete by In progress 
Review Process Create tool for request to author (google form) 
NancyGoogle form drafted In progress
Review ProcessCreate publication checklistCreate and finalize publication checklist for guide authors.

In progress
Review ProcessInvestigate and recommend tools to facilitate review process Investigate and test publishing workflow feature in LibGuides to see if meets our needs to  (can "groups" be set up so that HSL and Law could have their own workflow if needed?)
  • Determine to what extent the publishing workflow feature meets our needs
  • If publishing workflow does not meet our needs, recommend other mechanism/technology for guide review and approval 

Complete by 
Review processCreate/setup tool that author uses to submit guide for review 

Could be through the LG system, google form, an email to the review team, etc., we just have to be clear about how this happens.
Complete by 
Review processCreate/setup tool for providing feedback on guide to author Mechanism through which review team provides feedback. Could be a simple document like K-State's or form. 
Complete by 
Implementation Describe process for implementing standards and review process.Discuss at a meeting (8/23) to ensure that we are all on the same page.  

Ideas

  • Recommend audit of existing LibGuides to identify those that fall beyond the established scope and need to be moved to Drupal/FAQs
  • Proposal for how/timeline to revise existing course and subject guides to meet standards
  • Proposal for maintaining guides going forward (How do we maintain guides going forward? Do they need to go through a "recertification" process that ensures they continue to meet standards?)
  • Review team training 
  • Recommend that the first review team make note of how the review process is working, what changes may be needed, etc. and submit a brief report to administration after the first semester or year 
  • Describe extent to which HSL & Law are involved

Final report Create final report 



Final reportReview final reportReview final document (all parts except standards which should have been thoroughly reviewed at this point)All

...