Versions Compared

Old Version 30

changes.mady.by.user Jackie Sipes

Saved on

compared with

New Version 31

changes.mady.by.user Jackie Sipes

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Remaining Tasks as of Aug 15

CategoryTaskDescriptionWhoNotesStatus
StandardsReview standards document Review full document and note issues regarding readability/usability, consistency in tone and voice, need for more justification, need for directional infoAll
In progress 
Standards Review outlineReview standards outline for heading and section names and overall order All 

Standards Submit to external readerColleague outside of group read standards and 1) note anything confusing 2) test instructions to make sure process works when creating and editing actual guides
Ideas for who might do this?
Standards Finalize standards document Finishing touches after group and external reviewer have completed review 
How do we want to submit this with our report? As a document (it's current format) or should we go ahead and create the LibGuide? JS thinks LibGuides admins should review before we create Guide. 
Review ProcessDraft document of review process
Nancy
In progress
Review ProcessReview and comment on review doc
All
In progress 
Review Process Create tool for request to author (google form) 



Review ProcessInvestigate and recommend tools to facilitate review process Investigate and test publishing workflow feature in LibGuides to see if meets our needs to  (can "groups" be set up so that HSL and Law could have their own workflow if needed?)
  • Determine to what extent the publishing workflow feature meets our needs
  • If publishing workflow does not meet our needs, recommend other mechanism/technology for guide review and approval 



Review processCreate/setup tool that author uses to submit guide for review 

Could be through the LG system, google form, an email to the review team, etc., we just have to be clear about how this happens.


Review processCreate/setup tool for providing feedback on guide to author Mechanism through which review team provides feedback. Could be a simple document like K-State's or form. 


Implementation Describe process for implementing standards and review process.

Ideas

  • Recommend audit of existing LibGuides to identify those that fall beyond the established scope and need to be moved to Drupal/FAQs
  • Proposal for how/timeline to revise existing course and subject guides to meet standards
  • Proposal for maintaining guides going forward (How do we maintain guides going forward? Do they need to go through a "recertification" process that ensures they continue to meet standards?)
  • Review team training 
  • Recommend that the first review team make note of how the review process is working, what changes may be needed, etc. and submit a brief report to administration after the first semester or year 

Final report 




Design and content standards 

...