Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Discussion Topics

  • Welcome back Urooj!

    • Urooj is THE BEST!!!!

    • Maytham is the best!!!!

  • Debrief and reflections on OpenCon Philly (Annie)

    • Went very well, committee did a great job

    • Maria sent an official feedback form

    • Opening panel was very good

    • Urooj’s panel on open pedagogy went well and showcased varying projects done in the classroom

      • Professor on panel was excited about presenting with her student and indicative of “open”

    • Lightning talks were good; not rushed and well-designed; good amount of time

    • Jasmine’s accessibility workshop was good; her activity had a purpose and an immediate takeaway

    • OER workshop assessment activity was a little too specific

    • How specific software presentations fared against general products?

      • Some proposals seemed marketing-focused

    • Lunch in 341 was well-attended

    • Attendance varied from room to room despite full attendance

      • People may have left early or came late

      • Feedback said space seemed tight

      • Event space felt small too small to people

      • Registration totaled 125

    • Annie is writing up a report about issues with the space

    • Mic situation was tough

    • Projector issue was a struggle

    • Eduroam was not working

  • Ideas for a follow-up open pedagogy conversation (Urooj/Rebecca)

    • Robin DeRosa event on 10/31

      • Staff from CAT and Hope Center attended

    • Is there a way to continue a conversation about this that extends within and beyond TUL?

    • The framework says to reform higher ed--where to start? How do we talk about it?

      • Start with some tangible to create a vision

      • Revisit what we can do from the position of our work

      • Invite those who registered or go beyond?

    • Video will be posted to website with CC license

    • Start with one step

      • With liaisons--what could be assignments in your area? What do you see in your discipline that could become open? How would you approach faculty about this?

        • Ask everyone to bring a syllabus and work on an idea

        • Put out feelers and start a conversation to build up to a full-formed assignment/project

    • Rebecca and Urooj will create feedback form

  • TU ScholarShare Communications Toolkit next steps (Alicia)

    • Alicia wants to move forward on a proposed toolkit

      • Collaborative project with IR and fulfills SCSST team goal: marketing, outreach, and education materials for liaisons who are working with the IR

      • Brainstorming document about what could go in it

      • Alicia outlined contents of toolkits (1-2 page summaries for each subsection)

        • Branding materials

        • Outreach materials

        • Education materials/self-guided learning

        • Build your own materials--discipline specific

      • Highlights = what SCSST will work on; 2 people per subsection:

        • Open Access Elevator Speech

        • Open Access

        • IRs

        • Copyrights and permissions

        • Glossary of terms (joint effort)

        • Contact list (joint effort)

      • Each of us will take 2 with a deadline of December 18th

        • What would be helpful for liaisons to know?

      • This will be for our full IR launch (procurement is happening!)

  • To do's from last meeting: (Rebecca)

    • Tentative dates for spring workshops

    • Copyright Basics for Grad Students during week of March 23, 2020 (Rebecca)

    • Using Open Textbooks in the Classroom Workshop during week of March 9, 2020 (Kristina and Urooj)

    • Author Alliance on book publication contracts on April 22, 2020 (Annie)

    • Can I use that photo? during OA week on February 24, 2020 (Lauri)

  • Reaching out to liaisons about targeted workshops in academic departments

    • Kristina worked on email draft

    • Send out by November 22nd

Action items

Decisions